Supreme venture
Author: f | 2025-04-23
2,573 Followers, 367 Following, 375 Posts - Supreme Ventures Foundation (@supremeventuresfoundation) on Instagram: The Supreme Ventures Foundation was created to further enhance the Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives of the Supreme Ventures Group. About Supreme Ventures Limited - Not Affiliated. Supreme Ventures Limited (SVL) is a lottery gaming provider in Jamaica. It was founded in 2025.
Supreme Ventures Past Winning Numbers - Supreme Ventures
Policy regardless of which administration wins. After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June of 2022, Maven found itself in the spotlight as it worked to help employers navigate the emerging gaps in care. Ryder called the ruling a “devastating step back for healthcare in the United States” in a blog post at the time, adding that its clients could use Maven to reimburse patients’ travel across state lines.The company saw a 67% month-over-month increase in interest in travel benefits and health-care for pregnant people following the ruling. That same year, venture investments in women’s health companies ticked up 5%, according to a February report from Deloitte. Maven closed a $90 million funding round that November. Venture funding for the overall health tech market fell 27% during the same period, the report said. The amount of data available about women’s health is also improving, in part thanks to companies like Maven. In a post-Roe world, however, Ryder notes the information is often bleak, especially as experts are “starting to see a fuller picture of preventable death because of restricted access to care.” “I think between more funding and research, more data points from states, from platforms like ourselves, you can start to point and paint a complete picture of everything going on that helps change policy for the better,” Ryder said. “The question is, to be honest, when? And how many more people need to needlessly suffer in the meantime?”Content Source: www.cnbc.com
Supreme Ventures Limited (SVL) - Resignation of CEO, Supreme Ventures
The shareholders to approve the arrangement.The circular, form of proxy, voting instruction form and letter of transmittal, as applicable, for the meeting contain comprehensive information with respect to how registered and beneficial shareholders may vote on the matters to be considered at the meeting. As noted above, the circular and other meeting materials are also available under the company's profile on SEDAR+. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2024, and their duly appointed proxyholders are eligible to vote at the meeting.The deadline for completed proxies to be received by the company's transfer agent is Monday, Nov. 25, 2024, at 10 a.m. Vancouver time.Receipt of interim court orderThe company also announces that on Monday, Oct. 21, 2024, it obtained the interim order providing for the calling and holding of the meeting and other procedural matter from Supreme Court of British Columbia regarding the arrangement.Completion of the arrangement remains subject to, among other things: (i) approval of the arrangement resolution at the meeting; (ii) receipt of the final approval of the Supreme Court of British Columbia; and (iii) other customary closing conditions set forth in the arrangement agreement.About American Creek Resources Ltd. and the Treaty Creek projectAmerican Creek is a proud partner in the Treaty Creek project, a joint venture with Tudor Gold Corp., located in British Columbia's prolific Golden Triangle.American Creek holds a fully carried 20-per-cent interest in the Treaty Creek project until a production notice is given, meaning that no exploration or development costs are incurred by American Creek until such time as a production notice has been issued. American Creek shareholders have a unique opportunity to avoid the dilutive effects of exploration while maintaining their full 20-per-cent exposure to one of the world's most exciting megadeposits.The company also holds the Austruck-BonanzaSupreme Ventures launches ‘Supreme Heroes’
What Type of Sleeper is Best Suited to an Reverie Mattress?Based on our customer feedback, Reverie mattresses received the following grades among sleepers of different weights and preferred sleep positions; individual experiences vary by the selected firmness.Please note that these ratings are subjective, and that everyone has varying experiences on different mattresses.Sleeper comfort and spinal support are the most important factors when it comes to selecting a mattress.For more information on sleeping positions please see our guides for side, back, stomach and combination sleepers. Compare Mattresses How Do Reverie Mattresses Compare to Other Beds? Let’s look at some mattress models that are comparable to Reverie’s current selection. The following four brands offer mattress models with firmness settings that can be customized and/or adjusted. Similar Mattress Options Mattress Technical Details What You Need to Know About Reverie MattressesSizing and Pricing Twin XL $1,499 Dream II Hybrid $2,299 Dream Supreme I Natural $2,799 Dream Supreme II Natural $2,799 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Queen $1,999 Dream II Hybrid $3,149 Dream Supreme I Natural $3,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $3,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid King $2,499 Dream II Hybrid $4,199 Dream Supreme I Natural $4,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $4,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Split King $2,999 Dream II Hybrid $4,699 Dream Supreme I Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Dream Top King $4,699 Dream Supreme I Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Cali King $2,499 Dream II Hybrid $4,199 Dream Supreme I Natural $4,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $4,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Split Cali King $2,999 Dream II Hybrid $4,699 Dream Supreme I Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Dream Top Cali King $4,699 Dream Supreme I Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Natural $5,499 Dream Supreme II Hybrid Construction and FirmnessAll four Reverie hybrids are available in three firmness settings: Medium Soft, or 4 on the 1-10 firmness scale; Medium Firm, or 6; and Firm, or 7.Single firmness is offered for Twin XL mattresses, and all other sizes may be customized for dual firmness.A breakdown of layer and composition specifications is found in the table below.Please note that Reverie does not disclose certain specs, such as foam density, indentation load deflection, or the cover fabric for select models.Firmness is rated on a scale of 1 to 10. For more information on how firmness is calculated, please visit our Mattress Firmness page.AvailabilityReverie mattresses are available on the Reverie website. Additionally, these mattresses are sold through authorized online and brick-and-mortar retailers nationwide. Check out our favorite online mattresses. Sleep Trial None Shipping $5 fee, only ships contiguous U.S. Warranty 10 year limited Made In USA Reverie mattresses are not. 2,573 Followers, 367 Following, 375 Posts - Supreme Ventures Foundation (@supremeventuresfoundation) on Instagram: The Supreme Ventures Foundation was created to further enhance the Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives of the Supreme Ventures Group.iBet Supreme – Supreme Ventures Group – Jamaica
Armendariz sets forth the minimum standards of fairness that any employment pre-dispute arbitration agreement must meet to be enforceable Christina M. Coleman 2020 NovemberCalifornia has a reputation for being a very protective state when it comes to employee rights. While California’s current effort to end forced arbitration as a condition of employment, or retaliation for refusal, remains stayed, forced employment arbitration in California is still alive and well.In the meantime, employees still enjoy the protections provided by Armendariz and its progeny, designed to ensure that forced arbitrations are fair to the employee. While most plaintiff employment practitioners argue and believe that Armendariz helps, but still falls short of the protections needed to ensure fair arbitrations to employees, understanding Armendariz and enforcement of the rights it provides is what practitioners can do now.The game changer: ArmendarizPrior to 2000, employees were subject to mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements, imposed by their employers, that significantly disadvantaged employees in the arbitration process, and even deterred employees from being able to pursue their claims.Once arbitration had been compelled, there were minimal procedural requirements safeguarding fairness in the process. For example, the arbitration agreement could require the employee pay half the cost of the expensive arbitration proceedings. (24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1199.) The arbitration agreement could shorten the statute of limitations on the employee’s claims. (See, e.g., Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical Internat., Inc. (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1532, 1548 [“As for shortening the limitations period, the courts will enforce the parties’ agreement provided it is reasonable.”].)In 2000, the California Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 (“Armendariz”), which set forth the minimum standards of fairness that any employment pre-dispute arbitration agreement must meet to be enforceable. In Armendariz, the Supreme Court held that, under general contract principles, an arbitration agreement would not be enforced if it was unconscionable. (Id., 24 Cal.4th at 114.) An “unconscionable” contract is one that “affront[s] the sense of justice, decency, or reasonableness.” (Black’s Law Dict. (8th ed.2004) p. 1561.)Most importantly, the Supreme Court found that where such agreement purported to include statutory claims, such as the FEHA, the agreement would have to satisfy five additional minimum requirements including: (1) ensuring that the employee does not bear any costs above that which he or she would have to pay in court; (2) providing for adequate discovery; (3) providing for all types of relief that would otherwise be available in a non-arbitration forum; (4) requiring a written arbitration award and adequate judicial review; and (5) providing for a neutral arbitrator. (Armendariz, 24 Cal.4th. at 103-113.) The Supreme Court subsequently confirmed the minimum requirements setiBet Supreme Supreme Ventures Group Jamaica
Grindr, the dating app that caters to gay men, cannot be held responsible for the rape of a 15-year-old boy whom the company matched with sexual predators, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week; it is the latest teens-versus-tech battle in a fight over internet immunity that experts say could soon come before the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellate court’s ruling upheld a 2023 decision by U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II of the Central District of California, who dismissed the suit, saying Grindr was shielded by broad immunity protections passed almost a decade before the plaintiff was born. In a series of events Wright called “alarming and tragic,” a closeted Nova Scotia teen downloaded the LGBTQ+ hookup app in an attempt to meet other gay kids in his rural Canadian town. Instead, over the course of four days, he was assaulted by four adult men, including a man who picked him up after the teen sent him pictures from his high school cafeteria. Three of those men have since been convicted of sex crimes. The fourth remains at large. In a civil suit first filed in California Superior Court in Los Angeles and later moved to federal court, the boy’s attorneys argued in Doe vs. Grindr that, despite its adults-only terms of service, Grindr knew kids used its app and even marketed to them on TikTok and Instagram. About half of gay teens use Grindr while still underage, according to a 2018 study in the Journal of Adolescent Health. The suit also called the West Hollywood tech firm “a trafficking venture.” Wright and the 9th Circuit panel both disagreed, saying Grindr was shielded from responsibility for the rapes under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. “This would have been a moment for the 9th Circuit to recognize that a product that recommends children to adults is defective,” said the boy’s attorney Carrie Goldberg. “We have faith the Supreme Court, which has expressed disgust about the overreach of Section 230, will correct course on this disappointing result.” Section 230 gives broad immunity toSupreme Ventures on the App Store
Why can't I install SUPREME DUELIST?The installation of SUPREME DUELIST may fail because of the lack of device storage, poor network connection, or the compatibility of your Android device. Therefore, please check the minimum requirements first to make sure SUPREME DUELIST is compatible with your phone.How to check if SUPREME DUELIST is safe to download?SUPREME DUELIST is safe to download on APKPure, as it has a trusted and verified digital signature from its developer.How to download SUPREME DUELIST old versions?APKPure provides the latest version and all the older versions of SUPREME DUELIST. You can download any version you want from here: All Versions of SUPREME DUELISTWhat's the file size of SUPREME DUELIST?SUPREME DUELIST takes up around 71.4 MB of storage. It's recommended to download APKPure App to install SUPREME DUELIST successfully on your mobile device with faster speed.What language does SUPREME DUELIST support?SUPREME DUELIST supports isiZulu,中文,Việt Nam, and more languages. Go to More Info to know all the languages SUPREME DUELIST supports.Supreme Ventures Gaming - supremegames.com
The trial court s judgment because there were no disputed issues of material fact and, therefore, the appellees were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. The appellees assert 8 The trial court s judgment also awarded conditional attorney s fees to Smith, Sandion G.P., and Gruber, and to Hardeman and the Partnership in the event of successful appeals to the court of appeals or the Texas Supreme Court. 9 that they had no duty to disclose the restrictions against building a boat dock on land owned by a third party and that, when Sierra agreed to purchase the Property as is, Sierra agreed to conduct its own investigation, relied on that investigation, and thereby accepted the risk that it may have been wrong. The appellees further maintain that the trial court properly awarded their respective attorney s fees and that Sierra has waived its challenge to the trial court s evidentiary rulings. Standard of review We review the trial court s grant of summary judgment de novo. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture, 145 S.W.3d 150, 156 (Tex. 2004); Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc., 875 S.W.2d 695, 699 (Tex. 1994). When reviewing a summary judgment, we take as true all evidence favorable to the nonmovant, and we indulge every reasonable inference and resolve any doubts in the nonmovant s favor. Nixon v. Mr. Prop. Mgmt. Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985). A defendant who moves for summary judgment under Rule 166a(c), as here, is entitled to. 2,573 Followers, 367 Following, 375 Posts - Supreme Ventures Foundation (@supremeventuresfoundation) on Instagram: The Supreme Ventures Foundation was created to further enhance the Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives of the Supreme Ventures Group. About Supreme Ventures Limited - Not Affiliated. Supreme Ventures Limited (SVL) is a lottery gaming provider in Jamaica. It was founded in 2025.
Supreme Ventures Ltd. - The Org
Nicolas Cage and Nicholas Hoult in Renfield. Before I go off a bit on Renfield, let me state something up front: Nicolas Cage in this film is, unquestionably, one of the funniest, scariest and most eccentric Draculas in cinema history. If you are a Cage fan, there are things he does—little, brilliantly funny moments—that make Renfield worth seeing, if only for those.Now that we have that out of the way, it must be stated that, overall, the movie is a failure—an opportunity for a classically fun horror venture destroyed by some brutal narrative mistakes. Those mistakes result in too many minutes being a complete drag. It’s a real letdown.Nicholas Hoult plays the title character, Dracula’s manservant who has been hanging out with him for many decades. The film cleverly places Hoult and Cage in black-and-white flashbacks with the vibe of the 1931 Bela Lugosi take on the character. Great touch.Things start promisingly enough, but the main gag of Renfield being depressed and codependent quickly becomes tiresome, and a subplot involving a crime syndicate in New Orleans is a supreme dud thanks, in part, to lousy casting of the villains.Cage, meanwhile, shows up here and there—at first in varying well-done states of decay—and puts his nutty spin on Nosferatu. There are moments—including him introducing himself to Renfield’s support group in a way that’s almost bashful at times—that are laugh-out-loud funny. There are also moments where Cage is genuinely scary.But then the movie reverts back to Renfield being all depressed and gloomy; he only really comes to life when he eats the occasional bug to become a super-fighter—in super-violent and gory sequences, with a video-game feel, that clash with the Cage material. It’s disjointed and disorientating, and it ultimately takes the film down a few notches.They should’ve just called the movie DraculaFAQ's - Supreme Ventures FinTech
Related searches » supreme bot 下载 » supreme bot 購入 » supreme bot » supreme bot 日本語 » supreme bot インストール » bot supreme » bot supreme 2015 » supreme bot 日本 » chrome supreme free bot » supreme bot 最新 supreme trading bot download at UpdateStar S More Internet Download Manager 6.42.27.3 Internet Download Manager: An Efficient Tool for Speedy DownloadsInternet Download Manager, developed by Tonec Inc., is a popular software application designed to enhance the download speed of files from the internet. more info... More Driver Booster 12.3.0.557 IObit - 16.8MB - Shareware - Editor's Review: Driver Booster by IObitDriver Booster, developed by IObit, is a powerful driver updater tool designed to help users keep their system drivers up-to-date for optimal performance. more info... İ More chip 1-click download service 3.8.1.1 Chip Digital GmbH offers a convenient 1-click download service known as Chip 1-click download service. This service allows users to easily and quickly download software programs from the Chip.de website with just one click of a button. more info... More Download Master 7.1.3 Download Master: A Comprehensive Download ManagerDownload Master, developed by WestByte, is a versatile download manager designed to enhance your downloading experience. more info... supreme trading bot download search results Descriptions containing supreme trading bot download More Telegram Desktop 5.12.3 Pure instant messaging – simple, fast, secure, and synced across all your devices. Telegram, one of the world's top 10 most downloaded apps with over 800 million active users, offers a truly remarkable messaging experience.. 2,573 Followers, 367 Following, 375 Posts - Supreme Ventures Foundation (@supremeventuresfoundation) on Instagram: The Supreme Ventures Foundation was created to further enhance the Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives of the Supreme Ventures Group.Supreme Ventures Limited Launches its Supreme Domino
Supreme (stylized as SUPREME) is a character that appears in the Sonic the Hedgehog series. It is a colossal Titan created by the Ancients and once piloted by Crane. It ended up being used to bind The End within it and sealed within Cyber Space. Tens of thousands of years later, it is awoken and fought by Super Sonic on Ouranos Island. What is the origin of the character Supreme in the Sonic the Hedgehog series? In the Sonic the Hedgehog series, Supreme is a Titan of immense size, crafted by the Ancients and formerly controlled by Crane. This character exhibits remarkable strength, can generate sentries, and wields lasers and firearms. Supreme's significant role was to encapsulate The End, after which it was confined within Cyber Space. Supreme is a prominent character in Sonic Frontiers. Provided by: Fandom Who was the original pilot of Supreme in the Sonic series? In Sonic Frontiers, Supreme was originally piloted by an unnamed character, belonging to the Ancients species. This character, chronologically over 10,000 years old, was known for their good alignment and aversion to 'The End'. Their notable skill was piloting Supreme. Provided by: Fandom How does Supreme compare to Giganto in the Sonic series? In the Sonic series, Supreme and Giganto are colossal Titans with extraordinary strength. Supreme, featured in Sonic Frontiers, wields a sniper rifle for long-range attacks, requiring Sonic to transform into Super Sonic for combat. Conversely, Giganto serves as a standard adversary for Sonic, manipulated by Sage to obstruct Sonic's missions. Both were devised by the Ancients as formidable weapons. Provided by: Fandom What role does Supreme play in the plot of Sonic Frontiers? In Sonic Frontiers, Supreme is a colossal Titan, created by the Ancients and once operated by Crane. It was utilized to trap The End within it and was sealed in Cyber Space. Supreme emerges as a significant adversary in the final battle, where the player, in the form of Super Sonic, confronts it. The player's interaction with Supreme varies with the game's difficulty level. In easier modes, the player overcomes Supreme and The End usingComments
Policy regardless of which administration wins. After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June of 2022, Maven found itself in the spotlight as it worked to help employers navigate the emerging gaps in care. Ryder called the ruling a “devastating step back for healthcare in the United States” in a blog post at the time, adding that its clients could use Maven to reimburse patients’ travel across state lines.The company saw a 67% month-over-month increase in interest in travel benefits and health-care for pregnant people following the ruling. That same year, venture investments in women’s health companies ticked up 5%, according to a February report from Deloitte. Maven closed a $90 million funding round that November. Venture funding for the overall health tech market fell 27% during the same period, the report said. The amount of data available about women’s health is also improving, in part thanks to companies like Maven. In a post-Roe world, however, Ryder notes the information is often bleak, especially as experts are “starting to see a fuller picture of preventable death because of restricted access to care.” “I think between more funding and research, more data points from states, from platforms like ourselves, you can start to point and paint a complete picture of everything going on that helps change policy for the better,” Ryder said. “The question is, to be honest, when? And how many more people need to needlessly suffer in the meantime?”Content Source: www.cnbc.com
2025-03-24The shareholders to approve the arrangement.The circular, form of proxy, voting instruction form and letter of transmittal, as applicable, for the meeting contain comprehensive information with respect to how registered and beneficial shareholders may vote on the matters to be considered at the meeting. As noted above, the circular and other meeting materials are also available under the company's profile on SEDAR+. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2024, and their duly appointed proxyholders are eligible to vote at the meeting.The deadline for completed proxies to be received by the company's transfer agent is Monday, Nov. 25, 2024, at 10 a.m. Vancouver time.Receipt of interim court orderThe company also announces that on Monday, Oct. 21, 2024, it obtained the interim order providing for the calling and holding of the meeting and other procedural matter from Supreme Court of British Columbia regarding the arrangement.Completion of the arrangement remains subject to, among other things: (i) approval of the arrangement resolution at the meeting; (ii) receipt of the final approval of the Supreme Court of British Columbia; and (iii) other customary closing conditions set forth in the arrangement agreement.About American Creek Resources Ltd. and the Treaty Creek projectAmerican Creek is a proud partner in the Treaty Creek project, a joint venture with Tudor Gold Corp., located in British Columbia's prolific Golden Triangle.American Creek holds a fully carried 20-per-cent interest in the Treaty Creek project until a production notice is given, meaning that no exploration or development costs are incurred by American Creek until such time as a production notice has been issued. American Creek shareholders have a unique opportunity to avoid the dilutive effects of exploration while maintaining their full 20-per-cent exposure to one of the world's most exciting megadeposits.The company also holds the Austruck-Bonanza
2025-04-16Armendariz sets forth the minimum standards of fairness that any employment pre-dispute arbitration agreement must meet to be enforceable Christina M. Coleman 2020 NovemberCalifornia has a reputation for being a very protective state when it comes to employee rights. While California’s current effort to end forced arbitration as a condition of employment, or retaliation for refusal, remains stayed, forced employment arbitration in California is still alive and well.In the meantime, employees still enjoy the protections provided by Armendariz and its progeny, designed to ensure that forced arbitrations are fair to the employee. While most plaintiff employment practitioners argue and believe that Armendariz helps, but still falls short of the protections needed to ensure fair arbitrations to employees, understanding Armendariz and enforcement of the rights it provides is what practitioners can do now.The game changer: ArmendarizPrior to 2000, employees were subject to mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements, imposed by their employers, that significantly disadvantaged employees in the arbitration process, and even deterred employees from being able to pursue their claims.Once arbitration had been compelled, there were minimal procedural requirements safeguarding fairness in the process. For example, the arbitration agreement could require the employee pay half the cost of the expensive arbitration proceedings. (24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1199.) The arbitration agreement could shorten the statute of limitations on the employee’s claims. (See, e.g., Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical Internat., Inc. (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1532, 1548 [“As for shortening the limitations period, the courts will enforce the parties’ agreement provided it is reasonable.”].)In 2000, the California Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 (“Armendariz”), which set forth the minimum standards of fairness that any employment pre-dispute arbitration agreement must meet to be enforceable. In Armendariz, the Supreme Court held that, under general contract principles, an arbitration agreement would not be enforced if it was unconscionable. (Id., 24 Cal.4th at 114.) An “unconscionable” contract is one that “affront[s] the sense of justice, decency, or reasonableness.” (Black’s Law Dict. (8th ed.2004) p. 1561.)Most importantly, the Supreme Court found that where such agreement purported to include statutory claims, such as the FEHA, the agreement would have to satisfy five additional minimum requirements including: (1) ensuring that the employee does not bear any costs above that which he or she would have to pay in court; (2) providing for adequate discovery; (3) providing for all types of relief that would otherwise be available in a non-arbitration forum; (4) requiring a written arbitration award and adequate judicial review; and (5) providing for a neutral arbitrator. (Armendariz, 24 Cal.4th. at 103-113.) The Supreme Court subsequently confirmed the minimum requirements set
2025-04-22Grindr, the dating app that caters to gay men, cannot be held responsible for the rape of a 15-year-old boy whom the company matched with sexual predators, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week; it is the latest teens-versus-tech battle in a fight over internet immunity that experts say could soon come before the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellate court’s ruling upheld a 2023 decision by U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II of the Central District of California, who dismissed the suit, saying Grindr was shielded by broad immunity protections passed almost a decade before the plaintiff was born. In a series of events Wright called “alarming and tragic,” a closeted Nova Scotia teen downloaded the LGBTQ+ hookup app in an attempt to meet other gay kids in his rural Canadian town. Instead, over the course of four days, he was assaulted by four adult men, including a man who picked him up after the teen sent him pictures from his high school cafeteria. Three of those men have since been convicted of sex crimes. The fourth remains at large. In a civil suit first filed in California Superior Court in Los Angeles and later moved to federal court, the boy’s attorneys argued in Doe vs. Grindr that, despite its adults-only terms of service, Grindr knew kids used its app and even marketed to them on TikTok and Instagram. About half of gay teens use Grindr while still underage, according to a 2018 study in the Journal of Adolescent Health. The suit also called the West Hollywood tech firm “a trafficking venture.” Wright and the 9th Circuit panel both disagreed, saying Grindr was shielded from responsibility for the rapes under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. “This would have been a moment for the 9th Circuit to recognize that a product that recommends children to adults is defective,” said the boy’s attorney Carrie Goldberg. “We have faith the Supreme Court, which has expressed disgust about the overreach of Section 230, will correct course on this disappointing result.” Section 230 gives broad immunity to
2025-04-06The trial court s judgment because there were no disputed issues of material fact and, therefore, the appellees were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. The appellees assert 8 The trial court s judgment also awarded conditional attorney s fees to Smith, Sandion G.P., and Gruber, and to Hardeman and the Partnership in the event of successful appeals to the court of appeals or the Texas Supreme Court. 9 that they had no duty to disclose the restrictions against building a boat dock on land owned by a third party and that, when Sierra agreed to purchase the Property as is, Sierra agreed to conduct its own investigation, relied on that investigation, and thereby accepted the risk that it may have been wrong. The appellees further maintain that the trial court properly awarded their respective attorney s fees and that Sierra has waived its challenge to the trial court s evidentiary rulings. Standard of review We review the trial court s grant of summary judgment de novo. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture, 145 S.W.3d 150, 156 (Tex. 2004); Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc., 875 S.W.2d 695, 699 (Tex. 1994). When reviewing a summary judgment, we take as true all evidence favorable to the nonmovant, and we indulge every reasonable inference and resolve any doubts in the nonmovant s favor. Nixon v. Mr. Prop. Mgmt. Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985). A defendant who moves for summary judgment under Rule 166a(c), as here, is entitled to
2025-04-18