Xul runner

Avg. Rating 5.0 (1 votes) File Details File Size 39.2 MB License Open Source Operating System Windows 7/8/10/Vista/XP Date Added November 25, 2020 Total Downloads 320 Publisher M.C. Straver Homepage Basilisk Other Versions Publisher's Description Basilisk is a XUL-based web-browser demonstrating the Unified XUL Platform (UXP). This browser is a close twin to pre-Servo Firefox in how it operates. It is based on the Goanna layout and rendering engine (a fork of Gecko) and builds on the Unified XUL Platform (UXP), which in turn is a fork of the Mozilla code base without Servo or Rust. Basilisk is primarily a reference application for development of the XUL platform it builds upon, and additionally a potential replacement for Firefox.It supports a wide array of features required for the Modern Web, including advanced scripting, CSS, HTML5 and downloadable font support. It also fully supports all NPAPI plugins (e.g. Java, Unity web player, Media plugins, Authentication plugins). Latest Reviews Be the first to write a review! Avg. Rating 5.0 (1 votes) Your Rating --> Pros: 555 Cons: 555 Bottom Line: 555 YES / NO -->

JQuery 1.8.3 Released Woo hoo, Thanksgiving arrived early this year! jQuery 1.8.3 is available for download. You can get it here: (compressed, for production) (uncompressed, for debugging)We’ve notified the Google and Microsoft CDNs as well; we trust they will endeavor to post these files tout de suite. The complete change log for jQuery 1.8.3 is below. It’s a rather modest list, but we did nail a few important bugs and regressions.The team is already hard at work on jQuery 1.9 and would like to squash as many bugs as possible. To report a problem, please post a bug report and be sure to include a test case from jsfiddle.net or jsbin.com. Also try our work-in-progress build at to see if it’s already fixed. Many thanks to the patch contributors for this version; ye shall know them by their GitHub handles: gnarf37, timmywil, gibson042, rwldrn, joyvuu-dave, jaubourg, staabm, and sindresorhus. In addition, we thank all the community members who took the time to contribute quality bug reports with test cases. Your initial groundwork makes it possible for us to find and fix bugs.jQuery 1.8.3 Change LogAjax#12583: IE8 HTML bug (Chinese translation)#12635: jquery 1.8.2 fails ajax calls in IE9 because it assumes cross domain when default port is in ajax urlAttributes#10943: JQuery 1.7.1 does not properly set tabindex property on cloned element in IE7Core#12690: Minimum JS File Contains non-ASCII CharacterCss#10227: $('body').show() does'nt work if body style is set to display:none#12537: element.css('filter') returns undefined in IE9Deferred#12665: Callbacks objects with "unique" flag will iterate over a function's methods when it is added a second timeEffects#8685: Animations should keep track of animation state in order to properly address stacked animations#12497: jQuery 1.8.1 transitions crashing android 2.3.4 browser#12837: All animations break after zooming a lightbox on the iPadSelector#12643: Upgrade from 1.3.2 to 1.8.2 gives an Uncaught TypeError#12648: Can not correctly detect focus for DIVs with contenteditable in Chrome and SafariSupport#12357: jQuery 1.8.0 Not parseable by XUL Runner Applications

A problem with my internet connection.Also, if I used the icons at the top to arrange order, Uploadr immediately crashes. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) myfear says: Lucas Everett you are behind a proxy? try this www.flickr.com/photos/myfear/2109842015/ Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) rcrowley says: mll: I agree with oledoe, it looks to me like your photos have some strange characters in their EXIF or IPTC title fields. Have you tried adding any images that do not have titles/tags/descriptions embedded? I'm still working out some of the strange ways that metadata is stored inside image files.Da Silent Knight: There is a bug in 3.0.2 that causes batch titles/tags/descriptions to disappear. What's actually happening is that the Uploadr is saving that information out to all the images and then to a file on disk once each minute. None of your metadata has been lost. This issue will be addressed with the next incremental release. This is the issue many have experienced with metadata fields suddenly clearing themselves.pureguava: So far you've not authorized Flickr Uploadr 3.0 to access your account. When you start up Uploadr, click the blue Sign In button. When it's ready to authorize you, a prompt will come up offering to take you to the Flickr website. This will open your web browser. Go there and follow the instructions. When you're done on the website, come back to Uploadr and click the big READY! button. Then you'll be all set!WeeScot and LexnGer: The Picasa issue is a known one. If you use the Uploadr to add the titles to your photos you should have no problems. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) myfear says: rcrowley btw: I am looking into xul runner and extensions and so on at the moment. What do you think about extending the uploader with the extension mechanism? Would be a great way to collect some new features from the community :) Any plans @flickr for something like this at the moment? Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) really short says: It's terrible, I tag and describe all my photos, I go to upload,

Yes, I grasped—although you seem not to have grasped my (incredibly straightforward) response to it, which contained an aside about how Chrome got its name.I'll repeat myself: Firefox is already using the browser engine for its own UI, and that's been the case—I'll repeat again—since before it was even called Firefox. I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but the parent comment said> they recently announced that the UI is web component based - which means that using Servo for the window chrome is in the realm of possibilityIMO some of the key words there are "web component" and "Servo":1. IIRC you can't render XUL strictly with web components or anything that would be called "web", since that usually refers to web standards or something you would use from a webpage but not included as a standard (non-standardized extensions, flash, silverlight and so on).2. Regarding the Servo part, I don't think that Servo ever included XUL support at all. Servo isn't used wholesale as the rendering engine in firefox, but the parent comment talks about the possibility to use it and web standards for the browser chrome.I feel like you are responding to a comment that never was and then responding to a comment on that comment by saying the original comment was something you thought it was, but it wasn't. Funny, I feel the exact same way.> IIRC you can't render XUL strictly with web components or anything that would be called "web"> use [Servo] and web standards for the browser chrome.Geez, this is excruciating.If you want to use web standards for the browser chrome, this is not a new development. Because Gecko supports web standards. And Gecko has been used for the browser UI for years. There is nothing particular to Servo here. There's nothing particular to Rust.Using standardized web tech for the "window chrome" is not "in the realm of possibility". It is possible. Full stop. It has never not been the case. I'll happily "loose" this whatever this discussion is if I'm wrong (but the "win" reference is now removed from your comment) but the basic idea is:1. Servo supports many web standards, not XUL2. The firefox UI used to be built in XUL3. The firefox UI is now not built on XUL, but rather on web standardsThis means that the firefox UI can now be rendered by servo or similar components.That's basically the